Rucker v. Aymett

We recently held in Rucker v. Aymett, 186 Tenn. 672, 212 S. W. (2d) 659, that the amount in controversy re*296ferred to in onr garnishment statute (Williams’ Code, see. 8962) has reference to the amount involved in the garnishment of property, and not the amount of the judgment sought to be collected.

In the present cause we have granted certiorari and heard argument. Here the chancellor ordered certain notes to be turned over to the Clerk and Master as the property of Julian Aymett to be reduced to judgment and the proceeds turned over to Winafred Rucker to apply on her judgment.

The Court of…