Bowles v. State

Ian Bowles appeals his convictions for stalking and aggravated stalking in violation of court orders and a domestic violence injunction. Raising two issues, he argues that the trial, court erred in (1) denying his motion for mistrial and giving a curative instruction in connection with witness testimony, and (2) admitting irrelevant and prejudicial evidence concerning the related family court order. We agree that the trial court erred in admitting portions of the related family court order, and therefore reverse as’to the second issue. Because we reverse on the second issue, we decline to…