Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Town of Pittsford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petition unanimously granted, without costs, determination annulled and respondent directed to comply with the public hearing requirements of EDPL article 2. Memorandum: Petitioners seek review of respondent’s determination that a proposed taking of an eight-foot strip along the north edge of petitioners’ property for the purpose of building a sidewalk is de minimis and, hence, not subject to compliance with the provisions of EDPL 206 (subd [D]).

Having considered the quantity of land sought to be acquired, nearly 2,600 square feet of petitioners’ residential lot, and the *1141significant public…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rockland County Sewer District No. 1 v. J. & J. Dodge, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Zutt v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. In re the Acquisition of Real Property by the County of CortlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC v. Woodstone Lake Development, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC v. Woodstone Lake Development, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API