Legal Opinion

L.P.S. Enterprises of New York, Ltd. v. Senpike Mall Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of defendant’s cross motion for partial summary judgment seeking dismissal of those parts of the fourth and fifth causes of action that seek a refund for alleged common area cost overcharges that accrued prior to January 1,1996. In signing the lease, plaintiff expressly waived the right to audit common area charges for each year after the passage of two lease years (see, Hadden v Consolidated Edison Co., 45 NY2d 466, 469), and “[ajbsent some violation of law or transgression of a strong public…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Niagara County Sewer District No. 1 v. Town of NiagaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Moore v. GemerekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API