Dowell v. Long
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above). We need not determine whether it appeared from the allegations in appellee’s pleadings, as the trial court found it did, that appellant had committed actionable fraud in Delta county (Oakes v. Thompson, 58 Tex. Civ. App. 364, 125 S. W. 320), for appellee’s suit was not for fraud committed by appellant. It was, instead, a suit on a contract by the terms of which, he alleged, appellant was indebted to him in the sum of $340. That being the character of the suit, if the contract was not in writing, and it was not pretended that it was, it could not, over…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neal v. BarbeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Oakes Witt v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cockburn v. LessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Beale v. CherryhomesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Latshaw v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Evans v. HeldenfelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Bateman v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.