Legal Opinion
Van Dyke Johnson v. Stephen Doughty, Doctor, John Cearlock, Don Hinderliter
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 17, 2006No. 04-1139, 04-1311PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
433 F.3d 1001
Van Dyke JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Stephen DOUGHTY, Doctor, John Cearlock, Don Hinderliter, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-1139.
No. 04-1311.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Argued January 14, 2005.
Decided January 17, 2006.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Jerold S. Solovy, Marek H. Badyna (argued), Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Karen L. Kendall, Craig L. Unrath (argued), Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, Peoria, IL, Brett E. Legner (argued), Office of the Attorney General, Civil Appeals Division, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fleet Hamby v. Steven HammondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- (PC) Jercich v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019