Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephanie Corsmeier

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 16, 2010No. 08-3668PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClay, J., joined by Martin, J.,

KETHLEDGE, J. (pp. 422-23), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

OPINION

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Stephanie Corsmeier appeals following her conviction for conspiracy to commit bank, wire and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, three counts of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, three counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, three counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). For the following reasons, Defendant’s conviction is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. BranchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Servo Kinetics, Inc. v. Tokyo Precision Instruments Co. Ltd. Moog, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. James Terrell LattnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Roman HellemsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. State v. Morris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Morris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. Morris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. Morris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API