Legal Opinion

Commercial Bank v. Sandford

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit to foreclose a mortgage, and incidentally to cancel a tax deed to the mortgaged property.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

Ju this case, the defendants, other than Mrs. Sandford had interposed demurrers. The demurrers were heard and overruled, with leave to defendants to plead or answer as they were advised. 99 Eed. 154. Ail of the defendants have answered. Mrs. Julia B. Easterling, one of the defendants who had demurred, now disclaims. She produces in evidence her deed, executed 26th September, 1898, and duly recorded 12th December, 1898, whereby she conveyed in fee all her interest and ('state in this laud to E. B. Easterling, for $500. The cause, being at issue, was referred to a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Williams v. Peyton's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1819

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Godfrey v. WebbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  3. Wilson v. LockeIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McCutchen v. HinnantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  5. Smith v. DwightOregon Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API