Legal Opinion

Pansky v. Abrams

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

The plaintiff brought this action of tort to recover for injuries which according to the declaration were sustained on August 3, 1951, when she was caused to fall on a defective front step of property which stood in the name of the defendant, and in which the plaintiff resided. The answer was a general denial and an averment of contributory negligence.

The defendant duly excepted to the denial of a motion for a directed verdict. The jury found for the plaintiff. The case here was submitted on briefs. On the case submitted to us the motion should have been granted.

The bill of exceptions does…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Sneckner v. FeingoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Brownhill v. KivlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Griffin v. RudnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Shwartz v. FeinbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacob H. Gichner v. Antonio Troiano Tile & Marble Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Jacob H. Gichner v. Antonio Troiano Tile & Marble Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API