Legal Opinion

Foust v. Moorman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1850PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Prrkins, J.—

Tarlton Moorman filed a bill in chancery in the Randolph Circuit Court against the nine heirs of Christian Foust, deceased, praying partition of the lands descended from said Foust to those heirsi His right to claim *18partition is based upon sheriff’s deeds for the shares of two of said heirs, Lewis and James Foust, which deeds recite that said Moorman became the purchaser of those shares, at sheriff’s sale, on the 27th of June, 1840. The Court below decreed partition, and Christian Foust, one of said heirs, appeals to this Court, and insists:

1. That Moorman, claiming title by…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Varick & Bacon v. JacksonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1828
  2. Barnard v. PopeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  3. Snowden v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  4. Munroe v. WalbridgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1827

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. GodfreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Catherwood v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Webb v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Hoffman v. BeardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Boling v. HowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API