Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thome v. Benchmark Main Transit Associates, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 2011Published

1Dissent

Peradotto, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent because I cannot agree with the majority that there is a triable issue of fact whether plaintiffs actions were the sole proximate cause of his injuries.

This Labor Law and common-law negligence action arises out of an accident that occurred during the construction of a large retail store (hereafter, project). The concrete floor of the building contained several three-foot by three-foot holes that were not guarded or barricaded in any manner, although wooden pallets had been placed in the holes as a safety measure. At the time of the accident,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Cahill v. TRIBOROUGHNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Stolt v. General Foods Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Melber v. 6333 Main Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Whiting v. Dave Hennig, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API