Legal Opinion

In Re Sanford & Sons Bail Bonds, Inc.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 30, 2002PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · OgleNorma McGEE Ogle, J.

TIPTON and JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JJ„ joined.

The appellant, Sanford & Sons Bail Bonds, Inc., appeals the judgment of the Hamblen County Criminal Court forfeiting $5,000 bail in the case of criminal defendant Florentino DeJesus Hernandez. Following a review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Tenn.Code Ann. § 16-5-108(a)(2) (1994) 2 ; Judgment of the Criminal Court is Reversed and Remanded.

I

The instant case arose from a criminal prosecution in which the State preliminarily…

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Jenkins Subway, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. In Re Paul's Bonding Co., Inc.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Bond Forfeiture in Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. People v. AlbitarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Danny Blankenship Bonding Company v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  4. In Re Bail U Out BondingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2025
  5. In Re Bond Forfeiture in Pima County Cause Cr-20031154Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API