Legal Opinion
Kish v. Planning & Zoning Board
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 4, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The trial court erred in substituting its judgment for that of the defendant board. Sobol v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 158 Conn. 623, 262 A.2d 185; Belknap v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 380, 384, 232 A.2d 922, and cases cited; see Hawkes v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission, 156 Conn. 207, 240 A.2d 914.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to dismiss the appeal.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Belknap v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Hawkes v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Sobol v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clapp v. South Windsor Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971