Legal Opinion

Kish v. Planning & Zoning Board

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 4, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court erred in substituting its judgment for that of the defendant board. Sobol v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 158 Conn. 623, 262 A.2d 185; Belknap v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 380, 384, 232 A.2d 922, and cases cited; see Hawkes v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission, 156 Conn. 207, 240 A.2d 914.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to dismiss the appeal.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Belknap v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Hawkes v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Sobol v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clapp v. South Windsor Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971