State v. Roper
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree. ORS 161.450.1 He assigns as error the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal and the exclusion of the testimony of four witnesses. The motion for acquittal was based on two grounds: first, the purported failure of the state to prove venue in Multnomah County and, second, the failure of the state to prove an agreement to rob the specific victim named in the indictment.
On March 2, 1977, Billy Ray Small and Lynette Repp had a conversation in Multnomah County concerning the prospects of robbing a certain…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Wynn v. SundquistOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Flande v. BrazelOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. SchindlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RoperOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. WerdellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005