Legal Opinion

Fraenkel v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 13, 2018No. Civil Action No. 15-1080 (RMC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge

Abraham and Rachelle Fraenkel lost their son, Naftali, when Hamas terrorists kidnapped and murdered him and two other young men. The Fraenkels and their remaining six children sued the Syrian Arab Republic, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security (MOIS), as supporters of Hamas, under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. § 1602 et seq. (2012). On default judgment, the Court found in the Fraenkels' favor and awarded money damages. The Fraenkels moved to reconsider the damages because…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Braun v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Gates v. Syrian Arab RepublicDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. Moradi v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Stethem v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pescatore v. PinedaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Pescatore v. PinedaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API