Legal Opinion

Hopf v. United States Baking Co.

Superior Court of Buffalo

Decided October 15, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for a new trial made upon the minutes of the court. The head-note states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

When plaintiff rested his case defendant moved for a nonsuit; at the close of the trial it moved for the direction of a verdict, upon the ground that plaintiff, having elected to proceed against defendant for the recovery of wages, had waived the tort involved in the harboring, and could not now maintain this action. The same question was also raised by a request to charge the jury. All were denied, and defendant excepted. These grounds furnish the basis of the present motion.

There can be no doubt but that plaintiff was entitled to the care and control of his son, to enjoy his society, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dinsmore v. . DuncanNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. New-York Firemen Insurance v. LawrenceCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1816
  3. Woodward v. HarlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knight v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  2. Wolf v. VannoyNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API