Legal Opinion
Plante v. United States
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided August 30, 1963No. Civ. A. 2245PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, District Judge.
This is an action for a tax refund. The defendant, the United States, moved for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiffs’ case which was denied, and renewed the motion at the close of all the evidence. Disposition was reserved pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the case was submitted to the jury. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the full amount of the claimed refund and the defendant filed a motion to set aside the verdict and the judgment entered and to enter a judgment for it in accordance with its motion for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- John M. Trent and Lisa M. Trent v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Lloyd U. Noland, Jr., and Jane K. Noland v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Connecticut Light and Power Company and Subsidiaries v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Michael P. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
- Mulgrew Blacktop, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1969