Legal Opinion
Berke v. Tri Realtors
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1989No. A041236PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
TRI Realtors, The Realty Investment Company (TRI), appeals from an order denying its petition to compel the arbitration of its disputes with Ian Berke, individually and doing business as Ian Berke Real Estate (Berke), by the San Francisco Board of Realtors (Board of Realtors). TRI claims that the trial court erred in refusing to compel the Board of Realtors to arbitrate TRI’s disputes with Berke. We aflirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
TRI was the listing real estate broker for Nan and Kenneth Hecht, Jr., for the sale of their real property located in San Francisco.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- California Dental Assn. v. American Dental Assn.California Supreme Court · 1979
- California Trial Lawyers Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Williams v. Inglewood Board of Realtors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Davenport v. the Society of the CincinnatiConnecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Kurz v. Federation of Pétanque U.S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Coldwell Banker Manning Realty, Inc. v. Cushman & WakefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Coldwell Banker Manning Realty, Inc. v. Cushman & WakefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.