Legal Opinion

People v. Dagnino

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1978No. Crim. 16452PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

By a jury’s verdicts Joseph Dagnino, Jr., was convicted of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), and Debra Dagnino, his wife, of being an accessory (Pen. Code, § 32) to that burglary. He has appealed from a judgment, and she from an order granting probation, thereafter entered.

We have read the parties’ briefs and the trial record. Error is found which requires a reversal as to each defendant. We proceed to discuss that error.

*984Upon the jury’s announcement to the bailiff that they had reached their verdicts, counsel and the defendants had returned to the courtroom.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. BoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API