People v. Dagnino
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
By a jury’s verdicts Joseph Dagnino, Jr., was convicted of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), and Debra Dagnino, his wife, of being an accessory (Pen. Code, § 32) to that burglary. He has appealed from a judgment, and she from an order granting probation, thereafter entered.
We have read the parties’ briefs and the trial record. Error is found which requires a reversal as to each defendant. We proceed to discuss that error.
*984Upon the jury’s announcement to the bailiff that they had reached their verdicts, counsel and the defendants had returned to the courtroom.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. BoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.