Legal Opinion

Cavanah v. Martin

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1979No. 3867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

The issue before us is the proper standard of proof for commercial claims against a decedent’s estate. Orvel Cavanah claims that the estate of Harry Craig owes him approximately $30,000.00. 1 When Richard Martin, administrator of the estate, refused the claim, Cavanah filed suit. The matter was heard before a probate master who recommended rejection of the claim. Her report concluded that Cavanah had not adduced “clear and convincing proof” of his claim. The superior court adopted the report. 2 We reverse and hold that ordinarily claims against an estate need…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re Estate of NewsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Richards v. Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. In Re Estate of PomeroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. In Re Estate of HainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mahan v. First Nat. Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Hall v. TWS, INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Williams v. WainscottAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Mahan v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API