Cavanah v. Martin
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.
The issue before us is the proper standard of proof for commercial claims against a decedent’s estate. Orvel Cavanah claims that the estate of Harry Craig owes him approximately $30,000.00. 1 When Richard Martin, administrator of the estate, refused the claim, Cavanah filed suit. The matter was heard before a probate master who recommended rejection of the claim. Her report concluded that Cavanah had not adduced “clear and convincing proof” of his claim. The superior court adopted the report. 2 We reverse and hold that ordinarily claims against an estate need…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re Estate of NewsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Richards v. Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- In Re Estate of PomeroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- In Re Estate of HainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Mahan v. First Nat. Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Hall v. TWS, INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Williams v. WainscottAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Mahan v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984