Legal Opinion

Bautista v. Torres

Superior Court of Guam

Decided August 10, 2023No. CV0471-07Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

r.1! ~ ._I:·-n ... SUPERIOR COLWJ OF GUAM 2 2023 AUG IO Pf'i 3: 28 3 CLERK Of COURT 4 5 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM 7 8 ROSARIO S. BAUTISTA and MANUEL C. SHOLING, 9 Plaintiffs, CIVIL CASE NO. CV0471-07 10 11 vs. DECISION AND ORDER 12 FRANCISCO TORRES, Individually and as the Previous Special Administrator and Now 13 Executor of the ESTATE OF JESUS U. 14 TORRES, Deceased, and PETER F. PEREZ, 15 Defendants. 16 DANIEL U. TORRES and BARBARA M. 17 DeMELLO, TRUSTEE UNDER THE ESTEBAN TORRES FAMILY TRUST 18 DATED MAY 12, 1995, 19 Intervenor Plaintiffs, 20 vs. 21 22 ROSARIO S. BAUTISTA and MANUEL…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maximo Hilao, Class v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos, and Imelda R. Marcos Ferdinand R. Marcos, Representatives of the Estate of Ferdinand MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Smith v. CimmetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Mayer v. WillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Winbigler v. ShattuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API