GTE Southwest Inc. v. Public Utility Commission
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
KIDD, Justice.
Appellant GTE Southwest (“GTE”) petitioned appellee Public Utility Commission (the “Commission”)1 to increase its 1996 franchise tax “pass-through” to customer-ratepayers pursuant to section 3.211(f) of the Public Regulatory Act of 1995 (“PURA 95”).2 See PURA 95 § S.211(i) (West 1997). The Commission denied GTE’s request based on GTE’s election to be governed by the rate-freeze provisions of Subtitle H of PURA 95. See id. §§ 3.351-.359. The district court affirmed the Commission’s order. On appeal, GTE challenges the Commission’s decision, claiming that the Commission…
2Cases cited2 opinions
3Cited by9 opinions
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and Texas Genco, LP v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and Texas Genco, LP v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel Cities of Beaumont, Bridge City, Conroe, Groves, Nederland and Port Neches And Texas Industrial Energy Consumers, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.