Buschor v. Buschor

I agree with the majority that the modification of timesharing and change in the child's primary residence should be reversed on due process grounds. Therefore, a new trial on this issue is in order.

However, I disagree with the majority's conclusion that the trial court's denial of the relocation petition is not supported by competent, substantial evidence.5 Although *841I might well have weighed the factors differently were I the trial judge, it is not for this court to reweigh the evidence on appeal. Wraight v. Wraight , 71 So.3d 139, 142 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (recognizing in a relocation case…