Legal Opinion

People v. Gelfand

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1986PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ruth Moskowitz, J.

In this case, the court is asked to decide whether a second indictment filed more than six months after an indictment based on the same alleged criminal conduct was dismissed as defective due to an insufficient quorum in the Grand Jury must be dismissed because the People were not ready for trial within the applicable statutory period.

On June 20, 1984, indictment number 4161/83 was filed, charging the defendants herein with conspiracy in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 105.05), with attempted grand larceny in *269the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 155.35)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. WorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. GrudenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. WhetsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  2. People v. IronsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  3. People v. BeyahNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. SuritaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  5. People v. SteeleNew York Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API