Legal Opinion

Auerbach v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 13, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Young, J.:

The policy before us is an insurance contract provided for and regulated and governed by the Insurance Law. By it the company agrees to indemnify the assured from liability imposed by law, for damages on account of bodily injuries caused by the automobile vehicles owned or operated by the assured and therein described. Indemnity for such damage is the controlling purpose of the contract between the parties. Every other restriction and limitation is merely incidental thereto and must be read in the light „of that purpose, and must be construed in accordance with the true nature of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Wisconsin Zinc Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. New York Consolidated Railroad v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Brunswick Realty Co. v. Frankfort InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  5. McAleenan v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. ShilsPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API