Legal Opinion

Sproul v. Springman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1925No. 15498. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. ChiEE Justice Duncan

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the county court of Fayette county sustaining legal objections to and dismissing the amended petition of appellants, D. H. Sproul and others, for the organization of an outlet drainage district to be known as Okaw Valley Outlet Drainage District, under section 65a of the Levee act, added in 1917.

Under the original petition the proposed district was to embrace about 77,000 acres of land situated in the counties of Fayette, Clinton and Bond, the greater part of the proposed district being…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PenmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Maulding v. Skillet Fork River Outlet Union Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People ex rel. Williams v. DarstIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Merkle Drainage District v. HathawayIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moline School District v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Palmer v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. United States v. BraggsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Duck Island Hunting & Fishing Club v. Edward Gillen Dock, Dredge & Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Motion Picture Appeal Board of the City of Chicago v. S. K. FILMSAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API