Hadley v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Tipton Circuit Court.
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion.
Wiley, J.
I concur in the majority opinion of the court in holding that the facts found by the special verdict clearly show that appellant was guilty of negligence contributing to his injury, and for this reason cannot recover. Robinson, J., speaking for the majority, says that this case is clearly distinguishable from the case of Toledo, etc., R. Co. v. Hauck, 8 Ind. App. 367, but he does not, at any length, point out the difference between the two cases; and, as there is such a wide distinction between them, and as appellant relies largely on the Hauck case for a reversal,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hayden v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Splittorf v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Pyle v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Langan v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1880
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.