Biddles, Inc. v. Enright
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment and orders unanimously affirmed, with ebsts. Considering the history of the legislation upon the question involved,† the reasons advanced as justifying the law preventing theft and protecting the public from fraud, and in view of other similar legislation now upon the statute books and the decisions of our courts upon this and kindred subjects, we are of opinion that the acts in question tend to protect the safety and welfare of the community, and are within the rule laid down, by the Court of Appeals in Ives v. South Buffalo R. Co. (201 N. Y. 301). Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holsman v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- In Re WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Alexander v. EnrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Carlton v. City of WatertownNew York Supreme Court · 1924