Legal Opinion

Moransais v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 30, 2006No. SC04-703Published

1Per curiam

We have for review a decision of a district court of appeal on a question which the court certified to be of great public importance:

AFTER THE DECISION IN METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY v. HALL, 784 So.2d 1087 (Fla.2001), ARE TRIAL COURT ORDERS THAT ARE ENTERED AND FILED TO RESOLVE MOTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN PROPERLY FILED IN GOOD FAITH UNDER THE RULES OF PROCEDURE AUTOMATICALLY TREATED AS ACTIVITY, OR MUST THE TRIAL COURT CONTINUE TO ASSESS ITS OWN ORDERS TO DETERMINE WHETHER THEY ARE PASSIVE ENTRIES IN THE COURT RECORD?

*1268Moransais v. Jordan, 870 So.2d 177, 179 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We have jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SalamonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Metropolitan Dade County v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Moransais v. JordanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API