Legal Opinion
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 15, 1958PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The Government moves pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., for an order requiring each defendant, Bethlehem Steel Corporation and The Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company, to produce copies of reports filed by them for the year 1954 with the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. The reports, referred to as Forms BC 67 J, were submitted to the Bureau of Census to aid that agency in preparing five year censuses of manufactures and other businesses required by 13 U.S.C. § 131.
The defendants do not oppose production of copies of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Reuben B. Robertson, III v. Alexander P. Butterfield, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, Etal.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Continental Can Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Ghana Supply Commission v. New England Power Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- In Re FTC Corporate Patterns Report LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.