United States v. Harold Dorman
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
The principal question in this appeal is whether the government mét its burden to show beyond a reasonable doubt that Harold A. Dorman constructively possessed PCP seized from the laundry room of his mother’s home. Constructive possession of unlawful controlled substances is an expansive concept that this court has held requires a showing of more than mere residence in a jointly occupied home where drugs and guns are found in generally accessible areas and are not in plain view. Because Dorman’s constructive possession of a gun and ambiguous apology to his mother fail to…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Dawayne BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Khalid Qassim v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Corey Thompson v. Gregory SkipperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. LieuCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.