Legal Opinion

Joyce Marie Connor v. United States of America, District of Columbia (Two Cases)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 21, 1972No. 24348, 24349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

This is a tort case taken out of the ordinary only by the fact that the defendant-appellants are the District of Columbia and the United States, and that their positions diverge on questions of allocation of responsibility and jurisdiction.

I

The District of Columbia appeals from a judgment assessed against it, by virtue of a jury verdict, because of a defect in the sidewalk (protruding brick) which caused plaintiff to stumble. In general, the District of Columbia is like other municipalities in having a duty to repair sidewalks, albeit the obligation of other…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simpkins v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. Lovitt v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  3. YOUNGBLOOD v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API