Joyce Marie Connor v. United States of America, District of Columbia (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
This is a tort case taken out of the ordinary only by the fact that the defendant-appellants are the District of Columbia and the United States, and that their positions diverge on questions of allocation of responsibility and jurisdiction.
I
The District of Columbia appeals from a judgment assessed against it, by virtue of a jury verdict, because of a defect in the sidewalk (protruding brick) which caused plaintiff to stumble. In general, the District of Columbia is like other municipalities in having a duty to repair sidewalks, albeit the obligation of other…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Simpkins v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Lovitt v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- YOUNGBLOOD v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2025