Legal Opinion

Mangum v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1923No. 3925PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff in error was charged by an indictment in two counts with assault to commit the crime of rape and the commission'of the crime. From the judgment which followed he brings this appeal.

The evidence on behalf of the government tended to show that on the afternoon of July 19, 1921, while the prosecutrix was horseback riding on a military Teservation in Arizona, she suddenly met at a turn of the trail a negro soldier on a buckskin horse. The soldier immediately dismounted, grabbed the reins of the prosecutrix’s horse, seized! her, and notwithstanding her efforts to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
  4. State v. RogowayOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Flower v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Forte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. James Arena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. United States v. Paul Nathaniel HallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  4. State v. Francis Noboru YoshidaHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API