Legal Opinion
Brownson v. Roy
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1903No. Docket No. 29PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by Robert M. Brownson, receiver of Herman A. Strassburg, against Helen Roy, and also against Lucy J. Martin, for rent. From judgments for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
These cases were commenced in justice’s court. They were appealed to the circuit court. The judge directed a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff has brought them here by writ of error.
The trial judge, in directing a verdict, stated the questions involved as follows:
“The plaintiff is the receiver of Herman A. Strassburg. These are suits for rent. The facts are as follows:
“In September, 1901, the plaintiff called on each of the defendants, who were occupying as tenants under a lease from Herman A. Strassburg, and notified each of them that he was the receiver appointed by the court, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Low v. PewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Preston National Bank v. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Kane v. CloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Hawley v. BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Rickman v. RickmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Fournier v. CluttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Frontier Refining Co. v. Home BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Clark v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.