Legal Opinion

United States v. Gayden

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1985No. 84-578PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

The government appeals the suppression of appellee’s oral and written confessions, which the trial court found were obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Because we conclude the oral confession was the product of an arrest made without probable cause and the written confession was obtained by exploitation of the illegal arrest, Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200, 216, 99 S.Ct. 2248, 2258, 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979); Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 600-01, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2260-61, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975), we affirm.

I

The evidence presented at the suppression hearing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Gayden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Hammill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Morris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. United States v. TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API