Mosselman v. Caen
New York Supreme Court
APPEAL by the defendant from a judgment entered at a special term upon the verdict of a jury. The opinion of the court sets forth the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sutherland, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs as trustees of the estate and effects of the firm of Sichel & Company, merchants of Brussels in the kingdom of Belgium; the plaintiffs having been appointed such trustees by the court called the tribunal of commerce of the city of Brussels, which court had declared the said firm insolvent and bankrupt. The action was brought to recover the possession of certain goods and chattels in the possession of the defendant in the city of Mew York, the title and right of possession of which, it is alleged, passed to the plaintiffs as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holmes v. RemsenNew York Supreme Court · 1822
- Abraham v. PlestoroCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Accounting of WaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Robbins v. DeverillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Holbrook v. OrglerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1875
- Hunt v. JacksonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1866
- K v. HWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.