Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. Heinz North America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 5, 2007No. 06-4955Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Alfonso Green Wiggins, proceeding pro se, appeals an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting motions for summary judgment filed by Appellees, United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local # 56 (“Local 56”), Heinz North America (“Heinz”), and Heinz plant manager William McNeece, and denying Wiggins’ cross-motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we will affirm.

Wiggins was a member of Local 56 during his employment on the third sanitation shift at Heinz’s plant in Pennsauken, New Jersey. After consulting with officials from Local…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Natale v. Camden County Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Cherie Hugh v. Butler County Family YmcaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Carter v. McGradyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API