Legal Opinion
Russell v. Coughlin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 31, 1991No. 90 Civ. 1473 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Christopher Artuz (“Artuz”) and Captain Wilbur Wright (“Captain Wright”) have moved pursuant to Rule 3(j) of the Local Rules for the Southern District of New York for reargument of this court’s opinion and order of September 25, 1991, Russell v. Coughlin, 774 F.Supp. 189 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (the “Opinion”), denying as to them the motion made by them and various other defendants (collectively the “Defendants”) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of pro se plaintiff Jerome Russell (“Russell”), and, upon reargument, for an order granting them summary…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- James Williams v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, and W. Morgan, C.O., Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Ponte v. RealSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Russell v. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Russell v. SelskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Russell v. SelskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Russell v. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Ramirez v. SelskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993