Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated January 20, 1998
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 27, 1998No. 98 CV 1243(RR)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED Memorandum and ORDER
RAGGI, District Judge.
The Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York (PBA), which represents 26,000 New York City police officers and 19,000 rétired officers, moves to limit the testimony of three union officials who received subpoenas dated January 20, 1998 to appear before a grand jury that is investigating possible criminal conduct by a number of New York City police officers. The incident that is the focus of the federal inquiry has already led to the filing of both federal and state criminal charges against a number of police officers. .…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McCoy v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Viacom, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Bank of America, NA v. Terra Nova Ins. Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.