Legal Opinion

ASARCO LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 23, 2014No. 13-1435PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, ASARCO LLC (“ASAR-CO”), appeals the district court’s dismissal of its complaint. ASARCO sought contribution from Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Corporation (collectively “Union Pacific”), Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., and Bottling Group, LLC (collectively “Pepsi”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). The district court ruled that ASARCO’s direct contribution claim was time-barred under CERCLA § 113 (42 U.S.C. § 9613); that post-bankruptcy ASARCO was not a subrogee of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Burnett v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. Pace v. SwerdlowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LTF Real Estate Co. v. Expert South Tulsa, LLC (In re Expert South Tulsa, LLC)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Asarco LLC v. NL Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2015
  3. First American Title Ins. v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas - Kansas CityBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. Molina v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API