Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Williams' Legal Representatives

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Jlppeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited Ferris vs. Hunt, 18 Mo., 480; Fine vs. Gray, 19 Mo., 33 ; Harkness vs. Austin, 36 Mo., 47; Ranney vs. Bostic, 15 Mo., 215.

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Judge

At the April term, 1871, of the St. Louis circuit court, after this cause had been brought to issue, a suggestion of the death of Oily Williams, the sole defendant therein, was entered of record, and the cause was continued. At the April term 1872, more than three terms having elapsed after the suggestion of death, without any steps having been taken to bring in 'the legal representatives of said Williams, the plaintiff’s suit was dismissed by the court. At the same term, James R. Shields, of counsel for the plaintiff, made application to the court to reinstate said cause, and filed an…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Catholic Church v. TobbeinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Beardslee v. MorgnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Bruun v. Katz Drug Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Wernse v. McPikeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  5. Posthlewaite v. GhiselinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API