Legal Opinion
Seabury Housing Associates v. Home Insurance
District Court, D. Maine
Decided September 15, 1988No. Civ. 87-0350-PPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT HOME’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
During the construction of a condominium project in York, Maine, Plaintiff Sea-bury Housing Associates (“Seabury”) engaged Dunfey Agency (“Dunfey”) to secure insurance for the project. With Sea-bury’s consent, Dunfey selected a builder’s risk policy offered by The Home Insurance Company (“Home”), and completed the necessary documentation. Dunfey then assured Seabury that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc., Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Black v. SolmitzSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Linscott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Depositors Trust Co. v. Farm Family Life Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- In Re RichardsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wayne v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- In Re MCA, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1991
- Saucier v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Werman v. MaloneDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1990
- Curran v. Camden National Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2007