Legal Opinion

Wooten v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 10, 1987No. 86-2585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Based solely on the unchallenged finding that Wooten was a habitual offender, and notwithstanding the recommended guidelines range of 5-7½ years, the trial judge sentenced him to ten years for second degree grand theft. The ten year sentence, which is the maximum permissible for a habitual offender convicted of a third degree felony, § 775.084(4)(a)3, Fla.Stat. (1985), is unauthorized under Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986). On the other hand, as in Condiles v. State, 512 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we reject the defendant’s contention that the habitual offender statute may not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Condiles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Bellinger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Priester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Inscho v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Cowles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API