Legal Opinion

Department of Labor & Industries v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 6, 1996No. 18315-3-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, C.J.

Maston Mullins, a recipient of workers’ compensation benefits, challenges the Department of Labor and Industries’ (L&I) distribution formula regarding a third party settlement. We conclude that L&I’s formula for distributing the settlement proceeds was correct except for its failure to deduct L&I’s proportionate share of attorneys’ fees from the remaining balance. Thus, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Mullins sustained an on-the-job injury that left him *458permanently and totally disabled. He then brought a third party cause of action and obtained a $165,000 settlement. After…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JoswickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Longview Fibre Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Department of Labor & Industries v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API