Legal Opinion

Dunkle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 28, 2003No. 2D02-3018PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WHATLEY, Judge.

David P. Dunkle appeals his judgments and sentences for grand theft and dealing in stolen property. The State concedes error. In Hall v. State, 826 So.2d 268, 271 (Fla.2002), the Florida Supreme Court held that section 812.025, Florida Statutes (2000), prohibits a trial court from “adjudicating a defendant guilty of both theft and dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme or course of conduct pursuant to a plea of nolo contendere.” Here, in case number CF00-07081A-XX, the trial court erred in adjudicating Dunkle guilty and sentencing him to four years in prison…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garnett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API