Legal Opinion
Ruckstuhl v. Healy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The plaintiff vendee sues the defendant vendor to rescind a contract of sale of real property known as Nos. 834-836 Riverside Drive; to recover payment on the contract price of $5,000 and expenses incurred in the examination of title, and to have declared a total sum of $5,299 a lien on the property pursuant to a clause which provided for such hen. - The action is predicated upon the theory that the defendant misrepresented the nature of a third mortgage lien upon the premises.
As the complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiff’s case, her testimony and evidence are entitled to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bloomquist v. . FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Mead v. . BunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Greene v. . Barrett, Nephews Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- C. Bahnsen & Co. v. GerstNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Botway v. SchnitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- M. R. M. Realty Co. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Stirn v. 293 Avenue B Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928