Legal Opinion

United States v. Zatar Hunt

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 8, 2005No. 05-11352Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Zatar Hunt appeals his 86-month sentence, imposed after he pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). On appeal, Hunt argues that, in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by enhancing his sentence, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5), based on facts that were not charged in the indictment, admitted at the plea colloquy, or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Hunt also asserts that the district court erred by imposing his sentence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Charles Crawford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Juan PazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API