Legal Opinion

Galloway v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 1994No. 94-26PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

On November 19, 1992, William W. Galloway and others filed suit against the City of Russellville, Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (ASHTD), Arkansas State Highway Commission and its Commissioners and Director, seeking to enjoin a construction project to widen 2.5 miles of Highway 64 which runs through Russellville. Galloway alleged, among other things, that, under federal law, ASHTD was required to conduct a public hearing and prepare an environmental statement before proceeding with the project. Galloway claimed that ASHTD’s expenditures on the project,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hickory Neighborhood Defense League v. BurnleyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1988
  2. Puerto Rico Conservation Foundation v. LarsonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
  3. COUNTY HIGHWAY COM'N OF RUTHERFORD CTY. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. KohlsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Cardinal Freight Carriers, Inc. v. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Southern College of Naturopathy v. State Ex Rel. BeebeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Hicks v. MaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Martin v. KohlsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API