Legal Opinion

Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. Dalton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1902No. 12,754PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Miami district court; John T.- Burris, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J.:

This was an action brought by Jennie Dalton to recover damages from the railroad company for negligence in the discharge of its duty toward plaintiff, as a passenger. The facts were that plaintiff, accompanied by her sister, purchased a ticket and *662took passage upon one of defendant’s trains from Kansas City to Fontana, Kan. The train left Kansas City about 9 :45 p. m., and was due to arrive at Fontana about 11:40 p. m. It was a regular passenger-train, not scheduled to' stop at Fontana except upon signal. The brothers of plaintiff were at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trigg v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  2. City of Salina v. TrosperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. West v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Beaulieu v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Lonergan v. William Small & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Shelton v. BorntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Manser v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API