Simmons v. Sacchetti
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying the motion of defendants Vito Sacchetti and TMS Management Company for summary judgment in the entirety and the motion of defendant Ambassador Fuel and Oil Burner Corp. insofar as it sought to dismiss the cross claims against it and, as so modified, affirmed.
Triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendants Sacchetti and TMS negligently failed to maintain the apartment building’s boiler and domestic hot water system in a reasonably safe condition and whether the negligence of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Eaderesto v. 22 Leroy Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Moshe K. v. Nu Kol Tuv, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- A.M. v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
- Eaderesto v. 22 Leroy Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012